| Health Ministry Opposes Market Based Price Fixing Model by NPPA |
The health ministry may oppose the market-based price fixing model suggested in the draft National Pharmaceutical Pricing Policy (NPPP).
The ministry is of the opinion that a market-based pricing strategy, which in a broad sense takes the average of the prices of top three brands as the ceiling price, will not result in any real price control.
In a separate move, the ministry has also written to the Planning Commission to consider shifting the medicine price regulator — the National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA) — from under the administrative purview of the ministry of chemicals and fertilisers to the health ministry. The suggestion, which forms part of the ministry’s XII Plan recommendations, is meant to turn the NPPA function from a health or patient perspective rather than an industry friendly one.
The NPPA, which fixes the prices of medicines notified as scheduled drugs under the Drugs Price Control Order, is now part of the Department of Pharmaceuticals, a bureaucratic arm set up for the development of the pharmaceutical sector. Health ministry officials said they are in the process of formalising their opinion on the draft pharma pricing policy before conveying it to the Department of Pharmaceuticals.
The policy was criticised severely by public health groups, who said the proposal to end the cost-based price control mechanism could result in high medicine prices. The industry had welcomed this shift by saying that it would bring in more transparency in fixing drug prices.
The pharma pricing policy was prepared after the Supreme Court wanted the Central Government to frame a drug policy that will bring all essential medicines under price control. While the drug policy has only 18 per cent of the Rs 62,000-crore drug market under price control, the proposed one will cover over 60 per cent of the domestic drug market. The new policy will see all medicines on the National List of Essential Medicines (NLEM)-2011 under price control.
According to industry estimates, the NPPP will result in a dip of up to Rs 3,000 crore in the industry’s net profits.
A senior health ministry official said the ministry, which finalizes the list of essential medicines, may also add some more drugs to the recently updated list to accommodate some high priced life-saving drugs.
The health ministry is also proposing to provide all NLEM medicines free through public health institutions. The pricing policy will be final only after a Cabinet approval. The department of pharmaceuticals has not given any timeline for finalising the policy.
|
| RBI notifies new FDI norms for pharma sector |
The Reserve Bank on Friday notified new rules doing away with automatic approval for foreign direct investment (FDI) in existing pharmaceutical companies.
Tightening the norms, the government had last month done away with automatic approval of FDI in the existing pharmaceutical companies.
"FDI, up to 100 per cent, would be permitted for brownfield investment (i.e. investments in existing companies), in the pharmaceutical sector, under the Government approval route," RBI said in a notification.
Under the new rules, for any merger or acquisition, the overseas investor will have to seek permission from the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB). After six months, it will be the monopoly watchdog Competition Commission of India (CCI) which will vet such deals.
The decision follows directions from Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who along with his senior Cabinet colleagues had deliberated on October 10 over concerns arising out of several acquisitions of domestic pharmaceutical companies by overseas firms.
For the new investment, 100 per cent FDI will be allowed under the automatic route, under which investors only inform the Reserve Bank about the inflows and no specific government nod is required. "FDI, up to 100 per cent, under the automatic route, would continue to be permitted for green field investments in the pharmaceuticals sector," RBI said.
The filter was suggested by a high-level committee, headed by Planning Commission Member Arun Maira. Concerns have been raised over the impact of a spate of acquisitions of homegrown firms by multi-national companies.
The recent acquisitions include Ranbaxy Laboratories buy out by Daiichi Sankyo of Japan, Shanta Biotech by Sanofi Aventis of France and Piramal Health Care by Abbott Laboratories of the US. The affordability factor has so far been the hallmark of the Indian generic drugs all over the world, thanks to robust growth of the homegrown players.
|
| National Pharmaceuticals Pricing Policy may cost pharma firms Rs 3,000 crore: Industry |
The pharmaceutical companies may suffer sales loss of Rs 3,000 crore if the government's span of control increases, as proposed in the new pricing policy for the medicines, a section of the industry said.
In its memorandum to the Department of Pharmaceuticals, Indian Pharmaceutical Alliance (IPA) said the draft National Pharmaceuticals Pricing Policy (NPPP) 2011, would increase government control over 75 per cent of the drugs sold in the country.
"The IPA estimates that domestic price reductions alone will result in aggregate loss of sales of nearly Rs 3,000 crore, to the industry," the IPA said.
It said that NPPP 2011 proposes to add 1,154 drugs and 6,441 formulations. This would amount to raising the span of government control to 75 per cent, against 60 per cent of the retail market, as indicated in the NPPP.
"The proposed additions will enlarge the scope of price regulation by over eight times the current volume to about 68,000 packs making the task unwieldy and ineffective," the IPA said.
Drug price reductions in the country will also have corresponding impact on export realisation as the importers benchmark their purchase price to the domestic market.
|
In what could be a shot in the arm for government, the domestic pharma industry has endorsed price regulation model as suggested in the draft policy, subject to certain exemptions for indigenous research drugs.
Recently, the department of pharmaceuticals had proposed price control on all 348 essential medicines (National list of essential medicines) through a market-based pricing mechanism. Though initially reports suggested the industry was unhappy with the scope of price control being extended from the existing 74 drugs, it may not oppose it now. However, the MNC-led body OPPI has already made its concerns public by intervening in the ongoing drug pricing issue in the Supreme Court. The government will finalise the policy after receiving comments of all stakeholders.
Apex body, Indian Pharmaceutical Alliance (IPA), which represents the domestic industry, has said in a note to the government, the 12th Plan allocation for medicines will provide a growth opportunity, which will to some extent, minimize the losses due to the policy impact. The IPA estimates that price reduction alone will result in a revenue loss of around Rs 3,000 crore to the industry). The IPA expects government procurement of medicines which is done at discounted rates, to go up by six to seven times in the 12th Plan. This will provide a huge incremental growth to the industry, IPA secretary-general DG Shah told TOI.
The only reservation it has was on the span of control. The apex industry body feels the government should extend price control to only the NLEM, and not go beyond it. The draft policy proposes to add 1,154 drugs and 6,441 formulations, raising the span of control to 75% of the retail market.
Moreover, enlarging the list without the rationale of health policy could also defeat the objectives of NLEM 2011 of promoting rational use of medicines, and will end up legitimizing even irrational combinations.
To promote innovation, the industry has suggested exempting from price control --indigenous research products patented in India for a period of 10 years, as well as novel drug delivery system (NDDS) products, for 10 years and seven years respectively, from marketing approval. The IPA has lauded the government's efforts in exempting bulk drugs from the ambit of price control. Today, about 70% of industry depends on bulk drugs and intermediates from China. By keeping them out of price control, will encourage investment in local production of bulk drugs, and thereby reduce reliance on imports.
|